Статьи Support

Support
1 мин. чтения
Просмотры
7
🚨 CVE-2026-22110 The web server does not check authentication on POST or PUT. An unauthenticated attacker can reboot the charger; by brute-forcing the configid, they can also set the service password and then change any setting.
Support
1 мин. чтения
Просмотры
5
🚨 CVE-2026-22114 HTTP basic auth enforces no retry limit or backoff. Combined with the default service password, the keyspace is exhaustible.
Support
1 мин. чтения
Просмотры
6
🚨 CVE-2026-85268 A Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) (CWE-79) vulnerability in the auth/handler in Google Cloud Identity Platform and Firebase Authentication versions prior to 2026-08-14 on iOS allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript using a malicious iOS bundle ID.
Support
1 мин. чтения
Просмотры
5
🚨 CVE-2026-110681 Cpanel::JSON::XS versions before 4.80 for Perl use the parent interpreter's scalars from a parser object cloned into a new ithread. A parser object holds its callbacks and its incremental parse buffer as raw scalar pointers. When a thread is created, these are copied into the...
Support
1 мин. чтения
Просмотры
3
🚨 CVE-2026-86413 When using an *ambient user* in a first transfer doing Negotiate authentication and asked to follow redirects, curl could pass on its credential details to an unrelated second origin when asked to redirect there.
Support
1 мин. чтения
Просмотры
2
🚨 CVE-2026-86414 An HTTP proxy can trick libcurl into sending the origin's credentials (Basic password, or a Negotiate/Kerberos ticket) to the proxy itself, by answering the `CONNECT` tunnel request with 401 `WWW-Authenticate:` instead of the expected 407 `Proxy-Authenticate:`.
Support
1 мин. чтения
Просмотры
3
🚨 CVE-2026-86415 libcurl's connection cache match function never considers the automatic client certificate option, so a cached, already authenticated Schannel connection can be handed to a transfer that got redirected to a different origin, even though the code explicitly switched off the auto...
Support
1 мин. чтения
Просмотры
2
🚨 CVE-2026-87861 When using ambient user credentials, an HTTP request directed to one origin may be dispatched over a connection previously authenticated via Negotiate for a different origin, leaving the request's intended credentials unused.
Support
1 мин. чтения
Просмотры
3
🚨 CVE-2026-87862 Importing a `includeSubDomains` parent HSTS entry before a longer-lived child entry, silently drops the child. Consequently, when the parent expires, the child's valid HSTS policy is lost, causing curl to issue unencrypted HTTP requests rather than upgrading to HTTPS.
Support
1 мин. чтения
Просмотры
13
🚨 CVE-2026-87863 An authenticated HTTPS origin can supply an HSTS `max-age` value that the parser accepts, but time serialization later fails to process. On 64-bit systems, extreme max-age values compute an absolute expiry within standard time integer limits that exceeds calendar time structure...
Support
1 мин. чтения
Просмотры
3
🚨 CVE-2026-87864 Enabling `CURLOPT_CRLF` causes curl to advertise the raw input byte count in the `IMAP APPEND {N}` literal while transmitting line-ending expanded data. The server reads only $N$ bytes for the payload, causing the remaining overflow bytes to be interpreted and executed as...
Support
1 мин. чтения
Просмотры
2
🚨 CVE-2026-87865 When libcurl uses libssh2 with a hashed `known_hosts` file, an unrelated initial entry can cause host key validation to report a key *mismatch* as a *missing* key to the `CURLOPT_SSH_KEYFUNCTION` callback.
Support
1 мин. чтения
Просмотры
3
🚨 CVE-2025-68391 ARKETEAM Protectel modules PROTECTELMAJ and BDF are vulnerable to arbitrary file upload. Any user is able to upload arbitrary file and override existing files in a temporary folder. This vulnerability might lead to execution of embedded JavaScript scripts when an authenticated...
Support
1 мин. чтения
Просмотры
2
🚨 CVE-2025-68392 ARKETEAM Protectel modules PROTECTELMAJ and BDF allow low privileged users to use some of the functionalities reserved for admin users by forging direct requests to a specific endpoint. This issue has been fixed in: PROTECTELMAJ v6.5.19 and BDF v6.4.67
Support
1 мин. чтения
Просмотры
4
🚨 CVE-2025-68393 ARKETEAM Protectel modules PROTECTELMAJ and BDF are vulnerable to SQL injection vulnerability. Improper neutralization of input provided by a low privileged user into "Utilisateur" parameter allows for SQL Injection attacks. This issue has been fixed in: PROTECTELMAJ v6.5.19 and...
Support
1 мин. чтения
Просмотры
2
🚨 CVE-2025-68394 ARKETEAM Protectel modules PROTECTELMAJ and BDF are vulnerable to SQL injection vulnerability. Improper neutralization of input provided by a low privileged user into "profilInput" parameter allows for SQL Injection attacks. This issue has been fixed in: PROTECTELMAJ v6.5.19 and...
Support
1 мин. чтения
Просмотры
2
🚨 CVE-2025-68395 ARKETEAM Protectel modules PROTECTELMAJ and BDF contain a note editor module vulnerable to Stored XSS. A low privileged attacker can inject arbitrary HTML and JS into notes, which will be rendered/executed when a user visits this module. This issue has been fixed in...
Support
1 мин. чтения
Просмотры
4
🚨 CVE-2026-101209 Dell OpenManage Enterprise, versions prior to 4.8.0, contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information exposure.
Support
1 мин. чтения
Просмотры
3
🚨 CVE-2026-101210 Dell OpenManage Enterprise, versions prior to 4.8.0, contains an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to...
Support
1 мин. чтения
Просмотры
5
🚨 CVE-2026-101213 Dell OpenManage Enterprise, versions prior to 4.8.0, contains an Improper Privilege Management vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges.
Автоматический гарант это финансовая безопасность: Покупатель может быть уверен, что его деньги не попадут к продавцу до того, как он получит и проверит товар или услугу. Продавец, в свою очередь, защищен от не оплаты, так как гарант подтверждает наличие средств у покупателя до начала выполнения обязательств.
Назад
Сверху